Trends in Vehicle Leasing and Fleet Management

Dec 2004

Having collected and monitored statistics relating to the leasing and fleet management market over the last few years, members of the Southern African Vehicle Rental and Leasing Association (SAVRALA) are experiencing several important trends in their industry.

For the past five years, under the guidance of SAVRALA’s Leasing and Fleet Management Statistical Sub-Committee, the nine key players operating in this sector have been submitting their total vehicle/contract count figures.

Participating companies are Avis Fleet Services, Contract Lease Management, debis Fleet Management, FleetAfrica, Fleet Support Services (incorporating Imperial Fleet Services, Absa Fleet Services and McCarthy Fleet Services), LeasePlan Fleet Management, NedFleet, Standard Bank and Viamax Fleet.

Broken down into several defined categories, submissions have been made on a quarterly basis with the process of collecting, collating and reporting on these figures managed by Smart Practice, an impartial and independent company with the specialised skills and experience needed in managing such a project.

With consistent quality returns having been received over an extended period, it is now appropriate to publish some of the more interesting and useful results.

Figures currently represent the total parc of passenger and light commercial vehicles managed between the contributors in both the corporate and government sectors. As at 30 September 2004, they reveal that the association’s leasing and fleet management members are a major purchasing bloc within the motor sector, with almost a quarter of a million vehicles under their control.

The figures further reveal that there has been a minor decline in the overall funded contract count in the past year to around 68 000 vehicles. This really reflects the ‘status’ of the company car in corporate South Africa, a perk that has been under pressure over many years from the trend towards car allowances. With the impending announcement of changes to the fringe benefits tax legislation due in Trevor Manuel’s forthcoming Budget speech, however, this trend looks set to change. Another trend is that funded contracts managed for Government have declined from 2003 with only a negligible increase showing in Maintenance/Non-Funded contracts for this market.

Major growth has been experienced recently in managed contracts which show a growth of about 17,5% over the past year to around 190 000 contracts. The major portion of the growth has been in manufacturer maintenance plans reflecting the role that member companies play in what is essentially the retail rather than corporate arena.

SAVRALA Manufacturer of the Year 2004 Awards

Congratulations to all the winners!

Overall Leasing Rental
Gold: Nissan SA
Silver: Ford Motor Co. of SA
Bronze: Volkwagen of SA
Gold: Nissan SA
Silver: Ford Motor Co. of SA
Bronze: General Motors SA
Gold: Nissan SA
Silver: Ford Motor Co. of SA
Bronze: Mercedes-Benz
Manufacturer of the Year 2004
Nissan South Africa

Nissan SA romps home with Gold in the Overall, Leasing and Rental Sections.
From left, Nissan SA’s Chris Schell, Lara Gunning, Ria Tolken and Lionel Hillary
show off their well-earned booty!

.
Top industry awards for Nissan SA

For the second year, Nissan South Africa dominated Friday evening’s 2004 Southern African Vehicle Rental and Leasing Association’s (SAVRALA) awards taking the overall title of Manufacturer of the Year as well as top honours in both the leasing and rental sections.

Nissan’s combined overall score of 71,3 put them 2,2 points ahead of Ford/Mazda and 7,1 points up on third-placed Volkswagen of South Africa – the top three placings overall for 2004 remaining unchanged from the 2003 results. Mercedes-Benz was fourth overall followed by Toyota SA and General Motors SA.

In the rental section, Nissan walked away with the Gold ahead of Ford/Mazda (Silver) with Mercedes-Benz (Bronze) filling third place. Volkswagen was fourth ahead of Toyota. Leasing section honours went to Nissan with Ford/Mazda in second and General Motors SA in third places, this time with Toyota fourth ahead of Volkswagen.

“It’s very pleasing for us to be in this position once again,” says Mike Whitfield, Nissan’s marketing and sales director. “It verifies the direction in which we are heading is in accordance with customer expectations but, more importantly, demonstrates a level of consistent delivery.”

The SAVRALA awards reflect the service and support levels afforded by South Africa motor manufacturers and importers to the car rental and leasing sectors during the previous 12 months and are based on the results of independent research and evaluation carried out by research house, Smart Practice. Vehicle makes and models are not rated in the surveys undertaken.

“Nissan places great importance on the role and reflection of the SAVRALA organisation and we consider the players within the industry partners in many of the product and marketing decisions we make,” continues Whitfield.

“This year has been a very active and interesting one for the motor industry with growth well above all expectations. In this kind of growing market, it is important not to lose focus on core business such as fleets and Nissan SA will continue to provide the professional fleet market with products and levels of services and commitment that meet and exceed the requirements and expectations of each specific customer.”

“The stature and importance of the SAVRALA MOTY awards has grown tremendously over the last few years,” says John Broadway, president of SAVRALA. “They reflect the importance that our members have as one of the largest vehicle purchasing blocs in the country and emphasise the needs of our members in their dealings with the motor manufacturers and importers.

“To ensure that the manufacturer/SAVRALA dynamic is continuously reflected over time, we did review some of the elements of our scoring, but not to any point that we compromised the objectives and purpose of MOTY. I am very pleased to see that the final scores do actually reflect the assessments of the SAVRALA members.

“On behalf of the members, I would like to congratulate the winners and thank the manufacturers and importers for their support. The fleet management and vehicle rental industries are vitally dependant on both parties for the successful delivery of their products and MOTY is one method of determining the health of these relationships, which of course benefits our mutual customers,” states Broadway.

Ford/Mazda takes 2nd place across-the-board!
With three Silvers under their belt,
Team Ford/Mazda put in a great
performance during 2004
.
VWSA comes in 3rd place overall
Smiles all round from Volkswagen SA’s winning team!

Rental Bronze
A Bronze Certificate goes to Mercedes-Benz
for taking 3rd place in the Rental category.
Leasing Bronze
General Motors South Africa takes a well-deserved
3rd place Bronze in the Leasing category.

Pricing Trends & Developments

June 2004

Charging when and where the costs apply – as opposed to blanket rates increases – is a significant development within the car rental industry over the past few years.

Due to the highly competitive nature of the car rental industry, the ability to simply increase rates to compensate for inflationary cost pressures over the past eight years was simply not an option. Although, the competitive forces have squeezed rates so far that the industry is now under pressure to apply rate increases again.

Since the transition to our new democracy, there has been a significant increase in the number of car rental operators in South Africa, particularly the international brands.

Prior to 1994, there were just three international car rental brands operating at SA airports – Avis, Budget and Hertz (under the banner of Imperial Car Rental) while the local brands of Imperial and Tempest had developed significantly.

By the late 1990s and with the lifting of foreign trade restrictions, Hertz returned under its own banner and the additional brands of Europcar, National/Alamo and more recently, Thrifty have set up shop. Further exacerbating the competition was the fact that the Airports Company of SA (ACSA) allowed all of these new players to have kiosk space at the major airports.

Once the expected surge in foreign inbound tourists after 1994 had died down, the industry was left with almost double the amount of operators in a short space of time. The natural economic consequences of the additional players in what has been a pretty limited pie, was the inevitable price war, with virtually all participants holding and often reducing rates to maintain or attempt to grow market share. The ‘time and kilometre rates’ element of the revenue stream saw minimal increases (averaging at around 4% per annum from 2000 to 2004), while costs over the same period were very much higher.

A result of the competitive forces on standard rates has seen the industry move to the more logical approach of raising revenue by charging where the costs arise. Naturally, these additional costs are incurred where and when services outside the normal renting processes apply, delivery and collection fees for example.

Some years ago, vehicles were delivered (within a certain radius) and/or collected from the renter’s office, home or hotel, free of charge. Not so today – and quite rightly – as there are additional manpower and related expenses related to providing this service. The same applies for accident administration fees, traffic fine administration fees, additional driver charges, airport surcharges etc.

The overall effect is that the car rental invoice has become a lot more than the three or four line entries of 10 years ago (rates, waivers and fuel). Rest assured though, this trend has certainly kept car rental rates in check and the consumer has been the winner all the way. The result is an industry that has become leaner, cut out the waste and improved on its fleet utilization yield (from below 70% in 1999 to above 75% in 2004). The average renter now reaps the benefits of a keenly trimmed rate in the market and several operators to choose from.

This process of holding or reducing rates and applying additional charges, has given the impression that car rental has become more expensive, which is certainly not the case. In fact, when one compares the cost of a rented (small) vehicle, the average daily charge (including fuel and standard waiver cover plus 200 free kilometers) comes in around R300 per day and less than R400 for an air-conditioned vehicle.

Today one cannot get a reasonable taxi service from the airport to town – let alone back again for the same price. Ever tried to rent a lawn mower or a data projector lately? You’d fall off your chair. When considering the expense and high risk nature of the asset, car rental rates are extremely cheap in SA.

Other Developments
· Car rental industry aims to reduce risk
In an effort to further reduce risk to its members, SAVRALA has undertaken a few projects aimed at reducing unnecessary costs. One is to compile and share information of abusers of the industry. Here, we aim to stop renting to those who take our members “for a ride”, generally by running up debt and moving from car rental company to company, or those with unacceptable high accident rates and so forth.

This project is nearing its switch on date and the exciting aspect of this “Information Sharing” drive, is that it will be Internet-based, live and easy to apply. Only association members will have access to the data base and the list will be highly confidential. Members will sign a code of conduct and its application will be purely to reduce the bad debt, high risk and fraudulent element – the aim being to further reduce costs and provided added value to its member base.

· Educating the renter about risk
Another initiative which SAVRALA is currently undertaking in conjunction with ASATA, is to educate the renter and user of car rental services about the many risks related to car rental.

There is no doubt that over the past 10 years, the risks and related costs have risen sharply in this industry – especially where vehicle theft is concerned. Our borders have become easier to cross (witness recent news that 10 luxury, stolen vehicles had crossed the SA/Zimbabwe border at Beit Bridge) and the demand for stolen vehicles by the countries to the north of us, continues to increase.

Rental cars are an easy target for a number of reasons – not least that they are generally driven by visitors in unfamiliar areas and as such, become the targets of the common vehicle thief. The element of carelessness when the vehicle is ‘not your own and you’ve taken all the cover you can’ also adds fuel to the fire. These are the areas we need to address, to keep the renter aware of the risks and related costs and so raising the levels of caution at all times.

Besides the risk of damage and theft, there are also a number of additional expenses which arise from time to time, which we need to bring to the renters attention. These include items such as additional driver charges, traffic fine administration fees, etc. More importantly, the renter has to become more aware of the clauses relating to breach of the rental terms and conditions – which can come as a nasty and costly surprise in the event of accident damage and/or theft the vehicle.

For example, when a renter fails to return the vehicle by the agreed return date and time, he/she is no longer covered by any waiver option they may have signed for. In the event of an accident or theft taking place during the unauthorized, overdue rental period, the full cost for repair/replacement will be for the renter’s account.

By making use of the channels made available through travel agents (thanks to assistance from ASATA) and the general media, SAVRALA intends to heighten renter awareness of these risks and hopefully, further reduce losses and charges, benefiting both the industry and the user of our services.

· Car rental cover
It’s important to know that car rental operators do not sell insurance. Rental vehicles are “self-insured” and all risk lies with the owner of the vehicle. When renting a vehicle, the full risk of damage or loss to the vehicle as well as other party’s property is passed on to the renter. In effect, the car rental company wants to get its vehicle returned in the same condition in which it was rented and if damaged, the renter must pay for all repair costs – if no waiver cover was purchased.

To reduce the renter’s liability for possible damage and losses, car rental operators offer a few “waiver options” which afford their customers limited responsibility for damage and loss.

Acceptance of a standard damage and/or theft waiver reduces the renter’s liability for full damage and loss expenses to an “excess” charge of a few thousand rand, usually between five and 10 per cent of the value of the vehicle. Depending on vehicle category, this could vary between R5 000 for entry level models and R20 000 for luxury vehicles. Furthermore, acceptance of the super damage and/or loss waiver option further reduces this “excess” to around R1 000 for entry level cars and R4 000 for luxury vehicles.

In the event of an accident taking place involving no other vehicle, animal, person or object, most companies will apply a “double excess” charge. This may also applies when damages occur on a gravel road.

Third Party damage claims are generally covered by most car rental companies but only when any of the waiver options has been accepted.

The renter must also be aware that even if damage/loss waivers are purchased, these will fall away and zero cover be provided when the renter has breached the contract. Examples include allowing non-listed persons to drive the vehicle (not even hotel valet parking staff!), exceeding the agreed return date or time, legal transgressions including speeding, drinking and driving or cases of gross negligence.

When in doubt and for peace of mind when it comes to car rental travel, we always suggest that the renter takes the super waiver option, drives responsibly and keeps the vehicle parked as safely and securely as possible at all times.

Car rental charges are mostly uncomplicated and in line with expectations. It’s when accidents, theft and traffic violations occur – or when an unauthorized individual is handed the keys of the vehicle – that problems occur with a small percentage of rental transactions. These generally relate to additional charges and unexpected excesses or breach and full damage costs being applied.

· Dealing with accident theft or damage
For a renter, having a hired vehicle damaged or stolen, can be a traumatic and unpleasant experience. While the car rental operators are generally quick to respond by providing a replacement vehicle for the renter to continue on their journey, they are equally quick to respond with a full analysis and investigation of the incident. This is for a number of acceptable reasons, the first being to reduce further risk.

For example, if the renter has been reckless or careless, chances are that a replacement vehicle will not be provided. Furthermore, if the renter was in breach of the rental agreement, then the waiver covers will fall away and full costs of repair/replacement may be applied.

Here are some examples of what constitutes breach of car rental contracts:
1. Renter negligence – depending on the degree thereof – could constitute breach
2. Transgression of traffic laws or ordinances
3. Non-reporting of incidents to the car rental operator
4. Unauthorised cross-border travel
5. If vehicle is driven by an unauthorized and/or unlicensed driver
6. If the agreed rental return date and time has been exceeded – unless prior approval has been obtained
7. Driving off-road (gravel for example)

What to do, in the event of an accident and/or theft of the rented vehicle:
1. Notify your car rental operator (preferably the renting station) as soon as possible
2. Report the incident to the nearest police station and record the case number
3. In the event of an accident, do not admit guilt or liability to any other party. Take all details of other parties involved and pass these on to the rental company
4. Complete the rental company’s damage/theft report in full and attach a copy of your driver’s licence and identification document
5. If possible, get details of witnesses

Legislation impact on leasing companies

March 2004

In an effort to alleviate some of the problems associated with vehicle registration and traffic law enforcements, the National Department of Transport has promulgated two Acts – the National Traffic Information System (NaTIS) and the Administrative Adjudication of Road Traffic Offences (AARTO). These problems include the issues around stolen vehicles, unroadworthy vehicles and driver vehicles and their adjudication.

The AARTO Act has also introduced the possibility of a points demerit system that, for drivers who continually break the law, could result in the suspension or complete cancellation of their licences. NaTIS has been in place since 1996 and, with the pending enactment of AARTO, the combination of these Acts will enforce many significant changes to the way leasing companies have traditionally supported their clients. These changes are mostly in the areas of vehicle registration, vehicle licensing and traffic fine management.

When registering a vehicle, NaTIS requires the name and address of both a Titleholder and an Owner. In an effort to manage traffic fines on behalf of their customers and to simplify the annual re-licensing of vehicles through using their own representative and proxies, the leasing industry companies traditionally have designated themselves as both the Titleholder and Owner.

While there are many changes brought about by these Acts, those having the biggest impact on the leasing company/client relationship are outlined below.

NaTIS – Titleholder vs Owner

The Titleholder is the entity that has purchased (paid for) the vehicle – either a private individual or a company that has purchased the vehicle for cash or a financial institution or a leasing company that is financing the vehicle. Only the Titleholder may alienate (sell) the vehicle and they give permission to the Owner to use the vehicle.

The Owner of a vehicle in terms of the Act is the person who uses and enjoys a motor vehicle.

It is clear from the above definitions that by naming themselves as Owners, leasing companies are contravening the Act as they are not the “users” of the vehicles. The leasing company can only be the Titleholder and the Owner must be the client or their driver.

AARTO – Responsibility of the Owner

The AARTO Act has created a new offence whereby the Owner of the vehicle must, at all times, have the full names, residential and postal addresses and copy of ID or driving licence of the driver of a vehicle, before such driver is allowed to drive it:

  • AARTO – Demerit points vs triple fines
  • Once AARTO has been initiated throughout the country, most fines, especially fines for moving vehicle transgressions, will attract demerit points. All fines, except summonses issued directly to the driver of a vehicle, will be issued in the name of the registered Owner. It is the responsibility of the Owner to pay the fine and receive the demerit points or to have the fine re-issued in the name of another individual who was the driver.
  • Where the Owner is a company, the company is required to have the fine re-issued into the name of the driver. Should this not be possible because of insufficient records or the driver is no longer available, the company is required to pay triple the fine’s value as the demerit points cannot be allocated to a company.

To summarise, these Acts do not allow leasing companies to be Owners and Owners are required at all times to be able to positively identify the person who drove a vehicle. If they are not able to do this, they will have to pay three times the fine value.

The way forward …

While SAVRALA fully supports these initiatives, we have been and are still talking to government in an attempt to reduce the onerous requirements imposed on leasing companies and their clients.

May we suggest that you talk to your SAVRALA-member leasing company about the best possible solutions they are able to offer you to minimise the impact of these Acts on yourselves.

Resale values – are the good times going to stay?

February 2004

In general, demand in the used car market continues to be strong while supply is limited due to the relatively low level of new vehicle sales in recent years. Consequently used vehicle sales remain a profitable line of business for most dealers and for the members of the Southern African Vehicle Rental and Leasing Association (Savrala). However, not all vehicle segments benefit from this improved demand for used cars equally.

According to Savrala president, John Broadway, two trends are prevalent. “Firstly, in the new car market there has clearly been a buying-down pattern towards affordable cars that now have more powerful engines and extra luxury features. Most of the cars in the “small” and “medium” segments have standard features such as air-conditioning, power steering and air bags and represent approximately 65% of the total new passenger car market.

“Secondly, with new vehicle prices rising as steeply as they have in the past few years – certainly prior to 2003 – many private buyers, including allowance receivers, have opted to purchase a used vehicle to reduce costs but not lose out on features. Used car buyers today continue to look for vehicles with safety, reliability and comfort at reasonable running and fixed costs.”

He adds that these parallel trends naturally affect the residual values of vehicles at the time of their resale at end-of-rental/lease in different ways.

“There has been a marked improvement recently in the profits earned against the residual values that were set on small and medium cars three to five years ago. Due in part to demand driven through the “added value” of additional features, in the main, it is as a result of the spike in new vehicle price increases in 2002 of around 17%.”

The sustained current demand in the used car market has helped in supporting healthy resale margins for leasing companies in their small and medium vehicles fleets in particular. On the other hand, the year-old 2003 daily rental vehicles that will be sold as soon as the season is finished will probably not retain as much value as they did last year.

“It is important to appreciate, however, that while the current good times in vehicle resale are driven by events of the past, the residual value future simply cannot be predicted on the basis of today’s “good” trends,” adds Broadway.

“In forecasting resale values, both leasing/fleet management and rental companies need to take into consideration a number of factors including the forecast of new vehicle price increases, new model introductions, obsolescence as well as supply and demand.”

According to statistics compiled by Savrala’s leasing/fleet management members, very popular small cars such as the VW Polo, Toyota Corolla and Tazz and Opel Corsa are forecast to hold more than 50% of their 2004 purchase price after four years – having done 120 000km – in the second hand market. Similarly, many of the diesel derivatives recently launched into the medium to luxury segment are also expected to retain more than half of their 2004 price as their supply is limited and there is growing demand for diesel vehicles in the used market.

In some vehicle categories of residual value prediction, the Savrala statistics indicate the possibility that current residual value assessments by Savrala members exhibit an optimism that may prove unfounded in due course. Residuals have been increased year over year by as much as 3%, a trend that appears to contradict the logic of all fundamental analysis.

Broadway advises that a user of a leased vehicle should therefore ensure that their supplier is not being unduly optimistic, effectively trading a future residual value loss for a cheaper monthly rental – and a contract – today. “The simple economics of business dictate that the leasing supplier that under-prices a lease today will be compelled to ‘recover’, somehow, over the duration of, or at the end of, the lease contract and this may well lead to friction and distrust between fleet operators and fleet managers.”

More generally, he says there are some trends in the recent Savrala statistics that are illustrative of changing relative buyer patterns:

  • On average, super luxury, sporty and exotic cars probably will retain comparatively lower residual values than other vehicles. While residual percentages have remained reasonably stable on these vehicles over the years, they can be expected to drop slightly in the short term and will continue to soften because of recent new vehicle price reductions,
  • Resale values in the pick-up market are relatively stable generally and are favorable for the single cab pick-up in particular. Generally, double cab pick-ups are regarded more as leisure vehicles and therefore tend to compete in the wider passenger car market. Although double cabs offer some flexibility in application, they remain under pressure and are not retaining value particularly well in the used car market.
  • Similarly, 4×4 pick-ups (both single and double cab) are experiencing a poor run in the used car market, mainly because there are plenty of them on dealership floors at asking prices that do not reflect their resale values,
  • Over the past five years, demand for half-ton pick-ups has escalated strongly and the features in these cars have also been upgraded. Due to their low average running costs, the half-tons are popular as a normal passenger car in a household with occasional loads when the need arises. This has ensured strong resale values for end-of-lease vehicles currently.

The latest economic developments, the reductions in interest rates and the stronger Rand, do not have a direct affect on resale values in the short term concludes Broadway. “While lower interest rates do assist in holding the costs on fleets, and the stronger rand does affect the prices of imported cars and parts, the actual new vehicle price increases of below 2% in 2003 and predicted below 5% in 2004 mean that vehicle resale values may well fall by as much as 10% per year off current levels.

“This means that unless current residual values are very carefully and sensibly set, the margins on resale of ex-lease vehicles in 2006 and beyond will be under severe pressure, bearing no resemblance at all to the current ‘good times’ “.